Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Go Back   ScootDawg Forums > Performance :: Maintenance :: Technical > 50cc - 124cc
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-18-2013, 01:38 PM   #1
lykos23   lykos23 is offline
 
lykos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 151
Send a message via MSN to lykos23 Send a message via Skype™ to lykos23
Restricted Free Flow?

So last month my scooter was having problems with dying at idle, or not coming down from idle, leaving me shaking and vibrating like crazy at stops. No matter what I did to adjust the idle and a/f it kept having this problem. So I called up my local motorcycle shop and asked them how much it would cost to fix this. He said "bring me a 6-pack of pepsi", so I bought a twelve pack. Once I got my scooter to the shop, the guy is all "where the hell is the airbox?" and I was all "it was broken, so I put a freeflow on it", and he argued that the airbox has to restrict the airflow or you get the problems I'm complaining about, etc.

So, in five or so minutes he yanked my airfilter off, taped the hell out of it, then put it back on, adjusted the a/f, then the idle. Ever since then my idle has been fine, my scooter never dies at stops anymore, and the whole thing sounds different. I've got no real complaints, but I'm wondering if it is really my best option

Is it really all that good to have a restricted air filter? For instance; would I get more power out of my scooter if I upjetted my idle and removed the restriction? My main jet is 85, my idle is stock.

Here is a picture of what was done in case you want to try this for yourself:
http://i40.tinypic.com/6t1x84.jpg
I think he used electrical tape, but it was extra wide.


Edit:
Is it worth the $10 to order a new idle jet?
http://www.amazon.com/Jaguar-Power-S...A2VPA2J7YDDYST
And is this idle jet bigger than stock? I can't find the measurements



Login or Register to Remove Ads
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 03:20 PM   #2
4getful2   4getful2 is offline
 
4getful2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: illinois
Posts: 65
If you have a 50 cc, you could go with a #38 pilot jet and get rid of the tape issue.
Try scrappydogs, sometimes they're cheaper, when you include the freight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2013, 07:31 PM   #3
lykos23   lykos23 is offline
 
lykos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 151
Send a message via MSN to lykos23 Send a message via Skype™ to lykos23
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4getful2 View Post
If you have a 50 cc, you could go with a #38 pilot jet and get rid of the tape issue.
Try scrappydogs, sometimes they're cheaper, when you include the freight.
Thanks for the tip. I was considering that. And the site that I use, Power-Barn, doesn't seem to have the right pilot jet. Thanks for turning me on to scrappydogs.



Login or Register to Remove Ads
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 12:34 PM   #4
techie610   techie610 is offline
 
techie610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Buncombe Co. N.C.
Posts: 337
Send a message via Skype™ to techie610
Especially at low speeds, the carb needs to vacuum in the air, so that it will properly atomize with the gas.
__________________
2007 Sportiva Falcon
GY6 150 4T
7,200+ Mi.
68 ( GPS Verified )
76 MPG
Few Mods, Lots-O-Tweaks

2003 Vento Zip R3i TurboCam
50cc 2T
8,500+ Mi.
62mph ( GPS Verified )
90 MPG
Seriously Modded

Check out the new group for the Mountain Area!
http://www.scootdawg.net/group.php?groupid=4
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 01:02 AM   #5
50cc   50cc is offline
 
50cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 140
it's all about the even air flow. stick to the box. #85 is just about right for a stock box unless you live high in the mountains. i lost an engine because of a free-flow filter. don't risk it, just because it sounds cooler - YOU GET THE SAME POWER, plus a higher consumption.
__________________
50cc 139QMB, 7g sliders, manual petcock w/ transparent lines, Naraku CDI, Naraku belt, high output racing coil, 18.4mm CVK clone w/ #85 mj and #38 idle, needle @ leanest, OEM pipe mod, Kenda tires, NGK Iridium, lots of LED mods, 2.61L/100km (90 MPG)



Login or Register to Remove Ads
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 08:50 AM   #6
lykos23   lykos23 is offline
 
lykos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 151
Send a message via MSN to lykos23 Send a message via Skype™ to lykos23
Quote:
techie610 Especially at low speeds, the carb needs to vacuum in the air, so that it will properly atomize with the gas.
This makes sense. Given this information I re-taped the filter with tape starting at the base of the filter and it seems to run fine. First I tried again with no tape and had idling problems, then I tried it with tape starting at the base of the filter and in theory there should be more of a vaccuum effect now because the air source is farther away from the carb intake.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 50cc View Post
it's all about the even air flow. stick to the box. #85 is just about right for a stock box unless you live high in the mountains. i lost an engine because of a free-flow filter. don't risk it, just because it sounds cooler - YOU GET THE SAME POWER, plus a higher consumption.
Jeesh. That's horrible that you lost an engine. Is there anything that can be done with a freeflow to prevent this? I thought most bbk setups require a freeflow filter... Maybe I should upjet to a 90 for the time being...

Sadly I can't order a new airbox 'til some time next month, but I found this airbox on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Chinese-Scoote...ir+box+scooter

It advertises increased airflow for better performance, which might just be what I need since I have a 63cc and not a 49cc, however, I'm not sure.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.